The trademark law in UK is guided by the Trade Marks Act, 1994, The Trade Marks Regulations 2018. The relevant authorities governing the trademark in UK are UK Intellectual Property Office (UKIPO), The High Court of England and Wales, The Court of Session in Scotland and The High Court of Northern Ireland. UKIPO uses NICE … Continue reading ALL ABOUT TRADENAME PROTECTION IN UK
ARBITRATION CLAUSE IS ASSIGNABLE: BOMBAY HIGH COURT
According to the Bombay High Court, an arbitration agreement is assignable in the same way that any other contract is, and if the rights and obligations under an agreement that contains an arbitration clause are assigned in favour of the assignee, the arbitration remedy would also be assigned in that person's favour. In light of … Continue reading ARBITRATION CLAUSE IS ASSIGNABLE: BOMBAY HIGH COURT
BATTLE OF “NINETY ONE; 91” AND “NINETY NINE; 99” MARK ON CYCLE
An interim application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of CPC seeking interlocutory injunction had been filed by the plaintiff wherein ad interim injunction was granted in the favour of the plaintiff. The defendant further filed an interim application to vacate ad interim injunction granted on 11th October 2022. For the given below reasons … Continue reading BATTLE OF “NINETY ONE; 91” AND “NINETY NINE; 99” MARK ON CYCLE
SMALL/MEDIUM COMPANY SHOULD EXPLORE THE LEGAL RECOVERY THROUGH MSME ACT
What is an MSME? MSMEs serve as auxiliary units to large companies and make a substantial contribution to the country's inclusive industrial growth. The MSMEs are expanding their sphere of influence across economic sectors and generating a wide range of goods and services to satisfy domestic and international markets. CLASSIFICATIONSBASED ON PLANT & MACHINERYANNUAL TURNOVER Manufacturing … Continue reading SMALL/MEDIUM COMPANY SHOULD EXPLORE THE LEGAL RECOVERY THROUGH MSME ACT
Whether, the inquiry proceedings conducted by the ICC is quashed merely because ICC failed to complete inquiry within the time frame of 90 days?
The High Court of Delhi[1] is of the view that the inquiry proceedings cannot be quashed merely because ICC failed to complete inquiry proceedings with the time frame of 90 days. In the present case the petitioner, who is a qualified CA, has received a hearing notice by email dated 23.12.2022 from ICC constituted under … Continue reading Whether, the inquiry proceedings conducted by the ICC is quashed merely because ICC failed to complete inquiry within the time frame of 90 days?
WHAT IS PROCESS FEES IN A CASE AND PROCEDURE TO FILE PROCESS FEE IN COURT
Process fees (PF) A process fee is chargeable by the court to serve the other party involved in the case for example for serving summons, notices, and so on. Whenever anything has to be served to another party through court, pf is filed. No process shall be issued until the proper fee for its service … Continue reading WHAT IS PROCESS FEES IN A CASE AND PROCEDURE TO FILE PROCESS FEE IN COURT
STAY ON PAYMENT OF GST ON ROYALTY FOR GRANT OF MINING LEASE
The Honorable High Court of Jharkhand has stayed order of payment of GST on royalty for grant of mining lease in batch of petitions before it by an interim order vide Order dated 20.4.2022. The Order was based upon Para 3 of the Order passed in W.P.(T) No. 432 of 2021 dated 24.02.2022; which is … Continue reading STAY ON PAYMENT OF GST ON ROYALTY FOR GRANT OF MINING LEASE
WHETHER REVISION IS MAINTAINABLE AGAINST INTERLOCUTORY ORDER ?
CASE BRIEF IN THE MATTER OF: BAPUJI MURUGESAN VERSUS MYTHILI RAJAGOPALAN (Crl. R.C. No. 766 of 2019) FACTS:That the Petitioner was convicted by learned MM, Fast Track Court for an offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The appellant was directed to undergo imprisonment for a period of 6 months and was … Continue reading WHETHER REVISION IS MAINTAINABLE AGAINST INTERLOCUTORY ORDER ?
LANDMARK CASES ON TRADE MARK INFRINGEMENT OF LIQUOR BRANDS
LANDMARK CASES ON TRADE MARK INFRINGEMENT OF LIQUOR BRANDS Carlsberg India Pvt. Ltd vs. Radico Khaitan Ltd. Facts: Radico Khaitan Ltd., a manufacturer of alcoholic beverages was the plaintiff. The company was using the numeral i.e. 8 from 2006 itself till now, and they were generating scores of profit which was added onto their revenue … Continue reading LANDMARK CASES ON TRADE MARK INFRINGEMENT OF LIQUOR BRANDS
Rights of Independent Music Artists and basics of Copyright Law In India
FINAL MAY DUCTUS CR CONFERENCE FOR ARTISTDownload
DUCTUS EDGE 