Introduction: Plaintiff[1] has been producing and selling adhesives since 1969. The plaintiff asserts that it conducts business not only in India but also in North America, South America, the Middle East, Africa, and Asia. The trademarks and service marks of the plaintiff, includes HEATX, FEVICOL, LW+, LW, DR. FIXIT, and an artistic representation of two elephants pulling in … Continue reading MERELY SIMILARITY IN IMAGE IS TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT ?: FEVICOL CASE
ARBITRATION CLAUSE IS ASSIGNABLE: BOMBAY HIGH COURT
According to the Bombay High Court, an arbitration agreement is assignable in the same way that any other contract is, and if the rights and obligations under an agreement that contains an arbitration clause are assigned in favour of the assignee, the arbitration remedy would also be assigned in that person's favour. In light of … Continue reading ARBITRATION CLAUSE IS ASSIGNABLE: BOMBAY HIGH COURT
DUCTUS EDGE 