The Hon’ble High Court of Delhi order states that the defendant no.1 and/or the defendant no. 4 (who has registered mark in Saudi Arabia) are by way of an ad-interim injunction, restrained from affixing the mark ‘TAJ MAHAL’ or any other mark deceptively similar to the registered marks of the plaintiff(which is the mark registered … Continue reading What happened when two similar trademark for similar goods were registered, one in India and the other in a foreign nation?