INTRODUCTION: The case[1] is a miscellaneous first appeal filed under order 43 Rule 1(r) read with section 104 of CPC against the order passed by the Additional City Civil Judge, Bengaluru. In the following impugned order the judge had allowed the application filed by the Respondent –Plaintiff for temporary injunctions and restrained the Appellant – … Continue reading CASE WHERE BLINKIT NAME WAS IN DANGER
CASE OF TATA WATER PLUS V. TAZA WATER PLUS
INTRODUCTION: The present case[1] pertains to the copyright and trademark infringement of the plaintiffs’ mineral water product sold under the mark “TATA “and “TATA WATER PLUS.” The Plaintiffs discovered that Defendant was selling bottled drinking water in August 2020 using the trademark "TAZA WATER PLUS"; therefore, Plaintiff hired a private investigator to determine the precise … Continue reading CASE OF TATA WATER PLUS V. TAZA WATER PLUS
DO YOU KNOW NO ONE CAN USE STARBUCKS PRODUCT NAME “FRAPPUCCINO” WITHOUT THEIR CONSENT ?
Introduction[1]: Plaintiff has filed for the permanent injunction prohibiting the defendants from using the plaintiff's registered trade mark "FRAPPUCCINO," including the "BROWNIE Chips FRAPPUCCINO" mark or any other similar trade mark in connection with the plaintiff’s products and services. The Plaintiff: Plaintiff is a lifestyle brand company founded in 1985 under the name “STARBUCKS CORPORATION”. Its predecessor … Continue reading DO YOU KNOW NO ONE CAN USE STARBUCKS PRODUCT NAME “FRAPPUCCINO” WITHOUT THEIR CONSENT ?
INFRINGEMENT OF INDIA’S TRUSTED BRAND “TATA”
INTRODUCTION: The plaintiff, Tata Sons Private Limited, has brought this lawsuit against the defendants Anjani Bagaria and Mazing Retail Private Limited in the High Court of Delhi, in an effort to seek permanent injunction restraining trademark infringement, passing off, dilution, and tarnishment of trademarks. The plaintiff, Tata Sons Private Limited, is the major investment holding company … Continue reading INFRINGEMENT OF INDIA’S TRUSTED BRAND “TATA”
DUCTUS EDGE 